Symbols and the Dictionary

I think that it is true that Hayakawa and Orwell differ in their viewpoints, but I also think that both of them have at least some parts that are true.

In terms of symbols, I have to stick with what I said that it isn't impossible to explain concepts without using symbols, but I do agree that the use of symbols makes it a lot easier. And I think that the symbols that stand for a concept can be compared to the making of the dictionary. Like the dictionary, I believe that symbols are also a bit fluid. I think that as society changes so do symbols. Taking an example from Hayakawa, now, if someone were to be seen with tanned skin, it would be considered to be a symbol of wealth. I don't know what this symbol stood for a couple of centuries ago, but I highly doubt that it stands for the same thing as today. Also, I think bicycle tires and computer mice could symbolize patriotism, but on a more personal level. Unfortunately, I am unable to come up with a good example of that at the moment. Moving on, I think that the more personal symbol can connect to slang. Personal symbols differ according to the person just as slang differs according to the area. For example, there were some people from Haddonfield on my crew team this summer, and in casual conversation, they used all these different slang words that I haven't heard before. Now, maybe it's just because I happen to live under a very big rock, but I think that shows that even though the cities aren't that far from each other, the slang differs. This is why I think that the dictionary tends to stay away from including slang, even though it does put them a step behind. Although, I do admit that I have seen many attempts at trying to define all the different slang words (i.e. urbandictionary.com)

(Mary Quien)